Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Deney Wassermann vs Michiel De Krom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wassermann vs Krom analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Deney Wassermann vs Michiel De Krom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wassermann 0 - 1 Krom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wassermann has won 52.58% of points on their second serve, while Krom has won 49.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wassermann, in recent form, has won 50.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Krom has won 56.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.59% and 38.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wassermann has saved 61.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krom has saved 54.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wassermann has won 56.1% of matches played (W/L 23/ 18), with Krom winning 64.37% (W/L 56/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 75/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Krom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 130/ 95), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17), where as Krom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.37% of matches (W/L 56/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wassermann winning 0 times and Krom being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wassermann winning 0 and Krom winning 2. The last match between Wassermann and Krom was at the M15 Alkmaar, 22-06-2022, First, Clay with Michiel De Krom getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wassermann and Krom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wassermann winning 0 times and Krom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wassermann winning 0, and Krom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wassermann has played against opponents with an average rank of 162.49 while Krom has played against players with an average rank of 181.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wassermann has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krom has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wassermann has converted 37.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krom has converted 48.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
775
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
735
Rank
689
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
60% (106-72)
Career Total W/L
58% (190-139)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
70% (37-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Deney Wassermann vs Michiel De Krom For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wassermann VS Krom
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Wassermann VS Krom H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Michiel De Krom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 2 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (28/46) | 82% (31/38) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 81% (25/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 28% (5/18) | 57% (4/7) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 24% (9/38) | 63% (29/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Wassermann VS Krom H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Michiel De Krom
Player
Deney Wassermann
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Michiel De Krom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 70% (37/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (28/18) | 67% (82/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (239/200) | 58% (649/471) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 65% (13/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 73% (24/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 82 | 54 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:20 | 1:32:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.24 | 218.49 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (773/1393) | 71% (2062/2885) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (560/773) | 63% (1295/2062) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (326/620) | 50% (408/823) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (59/156) | 49% (174/358) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (570/1416) | 45% (1320/2913) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (13/8) | 70% (37/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (13/18) | 69% (36/52) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 43% (6/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 47% (7/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 87% (38/33) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 13% (38/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 27% (15/4) |
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Alec Deckers
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Mikail Alimli
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
8
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Deney Wassermann
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Michiel De Krom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Michiel De Krom
65%
(
89 of
137)
1st Serve %
66%
(
85 of
128)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
54 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
50 of
128)
133
Total Points Won
132
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Mika Lipp
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Twan Van Zijl
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Stijn Paardekooper
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
99)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Ryan Nijboer
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Miguel Damas
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Mario Mansilla Diez
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Michiel De Krom
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wassermann Vs Krom Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wassermann are available here and Krom photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
